Just got the marks in the MA course I have been teaching over winter. I was a fun course and a good way to learn more about online teaching situations as the course was 75% online. Plus it was refreshing to engage with students work of a postgrad quality.
I begin tutoring this afternoon for second semester.
Now I think I need a sleep for a few hours as I have the flu and besides the teaching responsibilities I have been working hard on the book chapter Shannon and I are co-authoring. Hopefully more about this later as the absolute deadline is Friday.
Despite my fondness for the adventure games of yore, it appears the days of puzzles in narrative games have come and gone. Puzzles – especially the serial unlocking variety found in the old LucasArts games – seem to have become a relic of a bygone era. Where they once provided a necessary ludic element to aâ€”clever and often complex narrative – designed to add challenge and force the player to earn his progress through the story – few modern players have the patience for such challenges anymore.
If we follow the Alex Galloway/McKenzie Wark argument where games have a logic that needs to be learnt so the ‘rules’ can be exploited, then every game is a form of puzzle. Abbott is making a neo-Kantian point about the incorporation of time for reflection in this gaming logic. What Abbott calls ‘puzzles’ allow for a greater duration of reflection in the necessary circuits of action-reaction of gaming practice than the contemporary ‘action’-based games. The loss of reflection time is lamented as a generational shift in market-determined game design. This shift is perhaps also apparent in the rise of RTS games (often with RPG elements) over their turn-based counterparts. The duration of gaming challenges can be understood on an affective spectrum from immersion to patience. Broadly speaking, in the temporality of gaming a shorter duration between action and the contingent (albeit program-based probabalistic) outcome of the action produces a more immersive experience.
Various comments in the original blog post (linked above) talk about the boring “click everything” gaming action of Myst and the like. The entire gaming representational space becomes a low-level intensive space where anything could potentially become a necessary component in the action. Compare this to the dialectical opposite, the ‘horror’ aesthetics of Doom 3 where, again, basically everything — every ‘corner’ or ‘darkness’, which there was a lot of in the game — could potentially be the location of a necessary component of action (a DEMON!). The aesthetic architecture of contingency in Doom 3 produced a high-level intensive space that forced gamers to experience the game in a far more immersive way compared to puzzle-based games. The acceerated rhythm of short-duration contingency of intense action-reaction circuits defines the genre of FPS. To a certain extent however, gamers also rejected this mode of action as they got bored being continually interpellated into Doom 3′s atmospheric immersion ‘trickery’.
Doing some final google research (lol) for some writing about mash-ups and came across these videos of video clip mashups of Girl Talk‘s latest album. The youtube user tries to replicate Girl Talk’s use of samples in video clip form. He is the third track, “Still Here”:
The increasingly diverse nature of the journalism â€˜jobâ€™ presents an increasing range of elements that need to be taught – and a decreasing amount of space to do so. In this context itâ€™s about teaching â€˜mindset, not skillsetâ€™, as Kevin Anderson, Mark Comerford, Andy Dickinson, David Cohn and others pointed out.
As my students would know from last semester’s first year journalism course I taught… Having a certain mindest is a skill though.